Biomarkers Renal
The table is adapted from Table 1 in Selby et al (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106645/), distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Adaptations include changes in the text of various entries and a new column with recommendations for use by EIBALL
Renal MRI
Update: April 2025
|
Biomarker |
Acquisition Modality |
Acquisition |
Target/Rationale |
Potential application(s) |
References |
Level of evidence |
Issues |
|
Volumetry |
T1 and/or T2 weighted structural images, typically in axial or coronal orientation |
The kidney is manually or semi-automatically segmented on each slice, and the total renal volume is calculated by summing the segmented areas and multiplying by the slice thickness. Advanced methods, such as automated segmentation using deep learning or 3D reconstruction techniques, can improve accuracy and efficiency. |
Gold standard technique FDA approved renal imaging biomarker |
Kidney length and volume and their change over time is a key measure in patients with ADPKD, but may also be important in CKD progression, primary and secondary hyperfiltration in diabetic nephropathy, renal transplants, renal artery stenosis, vesicoureteral reflux. |
[1-4!] |
Moderate Level 2 (Oxford) |
Cortical thickness may be more variable within the kidney, limiting reproducibility. |
|
Blood flow |
Phase contrast (PC-MRI) |
Exploits the different properties of moving versus static protons in a magnetic field. A moving proton have a ‘phase shift’ proportional to its velocity allowing calculation of flow. |
Blood flow velocity and volume |
Increased renal resistance to flow due to downstream microvascular obstruction, large-vessel arterial disease or changes in systemic haemodynamics. |
[5,6!] |
Low In Oxford classification this is does not classify as evidence |
Breathing-induced kidney motion can cause phase inconsistencies, requiring respiratory gating or navigator techniques. Further, PC-MRI sequences often require multiple cardiac phases, which increases the scan duration. |
|
Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL) |
2D or 3D pulsed or continuous ASL method |
Magnetically labelled water protons in blood that act as a diffusible tracer providing an internal endogenous contrast, following which labelled images are subtracted from control images to generate perfusion maps. |
Tissue perfusion |
Cortical perfusion, which can be affected by a number of pathophysiological processes in acute and chronic renal disease. |
[7,8!] |
High Level 2 (Oxford) |
Variability in arterial blood flow and labeling efficiency can impact renal ASL perfusion quantification, particularly in cases of renal artery stenosis or hemodynamic alterations. Additionally, ASL has lower sensitivity to medullary perfusion due to longer transit times and lower blood flow rates, making differentiation between cortical and medullary perfusion challenging. |
|
Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) |
EPI-Sequence |
Detects the displacement of water molecules within the architecture of tissues and quantifies this as the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) |
ADC may be affected by tubular flow and capillary perfusion, so true diffusion (D) can be measured using the Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) model, alongside pseudo-diffusion (tubular/vascular flow, D*) and flowing fraction (F) |
Assessment of AKI by evaluating edema and ischemia. Track of CKD progression by monitoring renal fibrosis, and provide insights into renal tumor differentiation, as malignant tumors typically show lower ADC values. In renal transplantation, ADC helps detect graft rejection or ischemic injury, while in hydronephrosis, it can assess kidney damage from obstruction. Additionally, ADC may aid in the early detection of diabetic nephropathy and quantify renal fibrosis in ADPKD, assisting in therapeutic monitoring. |
[9-12!] |
Low Level 3 |
Differences in MRI hardware, diffusion-weighting schemes, and post-processing methods can introduce variability and affect reproducibility of ADC measurements. |
|
Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) |
EPI-Sequence |
Similar to DWI but also assesses directionality of diffusion (Brownian motion), which is quantified as percentage of spatially oriented diffusion signal (fractional anisotropy, FA). |
Assessment of the degree of organisation in space of oriented tissues. Any changes in the microstructure that lead to a change in the preferred direction of water diffusion, for instance tubular dilatation, tubular obstruction, or a loss in the organisation of medullary tubules. |
Monitoring kidney transplant function, detect early signs of rejection or ischemia, and evaluate the impact of hydronephrosis on renal tissue. Additionally, DTI may assist in tracking microstructural changes in diabetic nephropathy and provide insights into renal microvascular changes in conditions like hypertension and renal artery stenosis. |
[9-12!] |
Low Level 4/5 |
The kidney's varying microstructure (cortex, medulla, and interstitial space) can lead to significant heterogeneity in diffusion properties, complicating the interpretation of DTI metrics. |
|
Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) MRI |
Gradient echo sequence |
Paramagnetic properties of deoxygenated haemoglobin act to shorten the transverse relaxation time constant (T2*). |
Changes in renal oxygenation, or changes in the microstructure of the capillary bed. |
Tissue hypoxia plays a key role in the development and progression of many kidney diseases. CKD patients with the lowest cortical oxygenation have the worst renal outcome. |
[13-16!] |
Low Level 3 |
Other factors such as hydration status, dietary sodium and susceptibility effects T2*. |
|
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) |
Gradient echo sequence |
Multiple phase images at different echo times to reduce background field inhomogeneities, followed by sophisticated post-processing algorithms to generate the susceptibility map. |
This technique provides insights into tissue composition, such as iron content or calcifications, and is useful for evaluating renal diseases like fibrosis, ischemia, or iron overload. |
QSM may help detect early changes in renal tissue composition associated with fibrosis, providing insights into disease progression. |
[17,18!] |
Low Level 4 |
Limited experience in human kidney |
|
T1 mapping |
Inversion Recovery (IR) or Look-Locker Sequence |
Application of an inversion pulse followed by a series of images at different time intervals after inversion to capture the recovery of longitudinal magnetization. |
Provides a quantitative map over the whole kidney for T1 values. T1 is a tissue-specific time variable that can distinguish different tissues. |
Changes in the molecular environment, e.g. water content, viscosity, temperature, fibrosis. |
[19,20!] |
Low Level 4 |
Factors like hydration, blood flow, or disease can alter T1 relaxation times, making interpretation challenging in pathologic conditions. |
|
T2 mapping |
Multi-Echo Spin-Echo (SE) Sequence |
The signal decay over the different echo times is used to calculate the T2 relaxation time by fitting the data to an exponential decay model. |
In the same way as T1 mapping, provides quantification of T2 as tissue-specific time parameter. |
Assessment of AKI by detecting early tissue changes, monitoring CKD progression through fibrosis and inflammation, and evaluating renal transplant function or rejection. Characterization of renal tumors, detection of microstructural changes in diabetic nephropathy, and assessment of tissue damage from hydronephrosis. Additionally, monitoring of cyst formation in APDKD and detection of iron overload in conditions like hemochromatosis. |
[19,20!] |
Low Level 4 |
Limited experience in human kidney disease to date. Changes in the molecular environment but assumed to be more sensitive to the effects of oedema and/or inflammation. |
|
MR Renography |
Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI |
Quantitative analysis of contrast agent (CA) transient in soft tissues. |
Allows measurement of perfusion filtration per unit tissue, vascularity and tubular transit times. |
Important and well-established tool. |
[21-24!] |
Low Level 4 |
Uses gadolinium-based contrast agents to change the T1 relaxation time of water in tissues. |
|
Magnetization Transfer (MT) |
A spin-echo or gradient-echo sequence is modified to include MT pulses |
These MT pulses selectively saturate the macromolecular pool of protons (e.g., proteins, collagen) without affecting free water protons. |
Allows fraction quantification of large macromolecules or immobilized cell membranes in tissue |
Assessment of renal fibrosis, monitoring inflammation and characterizing renal tumors. It can also be used to evaluate renal transplant function, detect tissue damage in hydronephrosis, and monitor structural changes in diabetic nephropathy. |
[25-27!] |
Low Level 5 |
Kidney movement due to respiration can lead to inaccuracies in quantification Low SNR, especially in patients with impaired kidney function. Limited experience in human kidney |
|
PDFF |
Dixon Method |
Chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation techniques |
A non-invasive, accurate method for assessing renal fat content. |
Diagnosing and monitoring conditions such as fatty kidney disease, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. |
[28-30!] |
Low Level 4 |
Post-processing software is required to accurately separate fat and water signals and provide a reliable fat fraction map for analysis. |
- Caroli A, Kline TL. Abdominal Imaging in ADPKD: Beyond Total Kidney Volume. J Clin Med 2023;12:5133. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155133.
- Bais T, Geertsema P, Knol MGE, van Gastel MDA, de Haas RJ, Meijer E, et al. Validation of the Mayo Imaging Classification System for Predicting Kidney Outcomes in ADPKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2024;19:591. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.0000000000000427.
- Grantham JJ, Torres VE, Chapman AB, Guay-Woodford LM, Bae KT, King BF, et al. Volume progression in polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2122–30. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa054341.
- Bae KT, Tao C, Zhu F, Bost JE, Chapman AB, Grantham JJ, et al. MRI-based Kidney Volume Measurements in ADPKD: Reliability and Effect of Gadolinium Enhancement. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN 2009;4:719–25. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03750708.
- Villa G, Ringgaard S, Hermann I, Noble R, Brambilla P, Khatir DS, et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to assess renal perfusion: a systematic review and statement paper. Magma N Y N 2020;33:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00772-0.
- Bane O, Seeliger E, Cox E, Stabinska J, Bechler E, Lewis S, et al. Renal MRI: From Nephron to NMR Signal. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 2023;58:1660–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28828.
- Odudu A, Nery F, Harteveld AA, Evans RG, Pendse D, Buchanan CE, et al. Arterial spin labelling MRI to measure renal perfusion: a systematic review and statement paper. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018;33:ii15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy180.
- Nery F, Buchanan CE, Harteveld AA, Odudu A, Bane O, Cox EF, et al. Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal ASL MRI. Magma N Y N 2020;33:141–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00800-z.
- Ljimani A, Caroli A, Laustsen C, Francis S, Mendichovszky IA, Bane O, et al. Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal diffusion-weighted MRI. Magma N Y N 2020;33:177–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00790-y.
- Caroli A, Schneider M, Friedli I, Ljimani A, De Seigneux S, Boor P, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess diffuse renal pathology: a systematic review and statement paper. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018;33:ii29–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy163.
- Jerome NP, Caroli A, Ljimani A. Renal Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM), and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI): Basic Concepts. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ 2021;2216:187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0978-1_11.
- Stabinska J, Wittsack H-J, Lerman LO, Ljimani A, Sigmund EE. Probing Renal Microstructure and Function with Advanced Diffusion MRI: Concepts, Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 2024;60:1259–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29127.
- Bane O, Mendichovszky IA, Milani B, Dekkers IA, Deux J-F, Eckerbom P, et al. Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal BOLD MRI. Magma N Y N 2020;33:199–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00802-x.
- Prasad PV. Evaluation of intra-renal oxygenation by BOLD MRI. Nephron Clin Pract 2006;103:c58-65. https://doi.org/10.1159/000090610.
- Pruijm M, Mendichovszky IA, Liss P, Van der Niepen P, Textor SC, Lerman LO, et al. Renal blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging to measure renal tissue oxygenation: a statement paper and systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018;33:ii22–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy243.
- Pruijm M, Milani B, Burnier M. Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent MRI to Assess Renal Oxygenation in Renal Diseases: Progresses and Challenges. Front Physiol 2017;7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00667.
- Bechler E, Stabinska J, Thiel T, Jasse J, Zukovs R, Valentin B, et al. Feasibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of the human kidney. Magma N Y N 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-020-00895-9.
- Bechler E, Stabinska J, Wittsack H-J. Analysis of different phase unwrapping methods to optimize quantitative susceptibility mapping in the abdomen. Magn Reson Med 2019;82:2077–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27891.
- Dekkers IA, de Boer A, Sharma K, Cox EF, Lamb HJ, Buckley DL, et al. Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal T1 and T2 mapping MRI. Magma N Y N 2020;33:163–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-019-00797-5.
- Wolf M, de Boer A, Sharma K, Boor P, Leiner T, Sunder-Plassmann G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging T1- and T2-mapping to assess renal structure and function: a systematic review and statement paper. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018;33:ii41–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy198.
- Kang SK, Huang WC, Wong S, Zhang JL, Stifelman MD, Bruno MT, et al. DCE MRI Measurement of Renal Function in Patients Undergoing Partial Nephrectomy: Preliminary Experience. Invest Radiol 2013;48:687–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182909e7b.
- Lee VS, Rusinek H, Noz ME, Lee P, Raghavan M, Kramer EL. Dynamic Three-dimensional MR Renography for the Measurement of Single Kidney Function: Initial Experience. Radiology 2003;227:289–94. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2271020383.
- de Priester JA, den Boer JA, Christiaans MHL, Kessels AGH, Giele ELW, Hasman A, et al. Automated quantitative evaluation of diseased and nondiseased renal transplants with MR renography. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 2003;17:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10217.
- Zhang JL, Rusinek H, Bokacheva L, Lerman LO, Chen Q, Prince C, et al. Functional assessment of the kidney from magnetic resonance and computed tomography renography: Impulse retention approach to a multicompartment model. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:278–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21489.
- Stabinska J, Müller-Lutz A, Wittsack H-J, Tell C, Rump LC, Ertas N, et al. Two point Dixon-based chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI in renal transplant patients on 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2022;90:61–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2022.04.004.
- Wang F, Kopylov D, Zu Z, Takahashi K, Wang S, Quarles CC, et al. Mapping murine diabetic kidney disease using chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI. Magn Reson Med 2016;76:1531–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26045.
- Wu Y, Zhang S, Soesbe TC, Yu J, Vinogradov E, Lenkinski RE, et al. pH imaging of mouse kidneys in vivo using a frequency-dependent paraCEST agent. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:2432–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25844.
- Liu J, Wu Y, Tian C, Zhang X, Su Z, Nie L, et al. Quantitative assessment of renal steatosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using the iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation quantification sequence imaging: repeatability and clinical implications. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2024;14:7341–52. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-330.
- Zhao K, Seeliger E, Niendorf T, Liu Z. Noninvasive Assessment of Diabetic Kidney Disease With MRI: Hype or Hope? J Magn Reson Imaging 2024;59:1494–513. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29000.
- Gjela M, Askeland A, Frøkjær JB, Mellergaard M, Handberg A. MRI-based quantification of renal fat in obese individuals using different image analysis approaches. Abdom Radiol N Y 2022;47:3546–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03603-4.